|
NOINDEX
includes/content/subnav.asp NOINDEX
|
Testimony
SENATE HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR AND PENSIONS (HELP) COMMITTEE
June 13, 2002
10:00 am
“Implementing Reading First and Reading Programs and Strategies”
Testimony by
Trisha Rhodes, Hancock County Consortium, Bar Harbor, Maine
Chairman Kennedy and members of the committee, thank you for this
opportunity to speak from both personal and professional experience
to what works for children learning to read. My career as an
educator began as a speech and language teacher. Later I became
certified as a classroom teacher and a literacy specialist. Then I
taught 7th-8th grade literature and language arts for three years.
It was these experiences that led me to pursue training as a Reading
Recovery teacher. Even with my background in language development
and my training as a literacy specialist, I was frustrated with my
inability to reach my struggling readers and bring them up to grade
level. I knew they were being left behind. This led me to search for
information about teaching children how to read in the early stages
of learning. When I read about Reading Recovery I was excited and
impressed because Dr. Clay shared my beliefs that early intervention
is crucial to reach children before they fail, and she had created a
program of professional development based on scientific research.
I asked my district to train me as a Reading Recovery teacher, and
that training significantly added to my ability to teach emergent
readers. My teaching was so successful that the decision was made to
train Reading Recovery teachers in most of the schools in my
district. Due to the high quality of ongoing training in Reading
Recovery, all of the Reading Recovery teachers in my district have
emerged as leaders in their schools. They have formed teams with
classroom teachers and special educators to create more effective
reading programs and to establish standards and assessments in their
individual schools and for our district as a whole. The result has
been positive systemic change with Reading Recovery working with a
variety of classroom approaches. An image to consider is that of a
tricycle. The largest of the three wheels is classroom instruction
and the two smaller wheels are short-term early intervention such as
Reading Recovery and long-term continuing support such as special
education. This image is helpful because it both illustrates the
importance of classroom instruction and the importance of support
services for low-achieving students in order for the educational
process to work.
I have been teaching for 18 years and 12 of those years have been
spent teaching the lowest performing first grade children how to
read and write. I teach children every day, and the growth I see,
not only in their ability to read and write, but in feelings of self
esteem, is impressive. I have experienced first hand the two
positive outcomes of Reading Recovery. These are: 1) the ability for
children who are the lowest-achieving at the beginning of first
grade to accelerate into the average performance range of their
classmates, and 2) the early identification of the few children who
will need long term support through special services to ensure that
no child is left behind.
About Reading Recovery: Reading Recovery has served more than one
million children since implementation in the United States in 1984.
Reading Recovery is:
A short-term (12 to 20 weeks) early intervention that helps
lowest-achieving first grade children develop effective strategies
for reading and writing at grade level.
Intensive, daily one-to-one instruction for thirty (30) minutes that
supplements the child’s classroom learning.
An integral component of a comprehensive literacy program that is
compatible with all classroom teaching approaches.
A year-long training course and on-going training for every year
that the teacher teaches children Reading Recovery.
Accountable with program evaluation that counts every child,
monitors results, and makes changes based on results.
Available in Spanish, French, and under development in other
languages around the world.
Reading Recovery and the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB): Reading
Recovery meets the standards set by the No Child Left Behind Act.
Reading Recovery includes the essential components of reading
instruction, meets the definition of scientifically-based research,
and uses rigorous assessments. Reading Recovery is closing the gap
for at-risk readers. It explicitly incorporates the essential
components of reading instruction into every lesson, including
comprehension, fluency, vocabulary development, phonemic awareness,
and phonics (teaching letters, sounds, and word parts and how to use
them in figuring out a word).
Reading Recovery has a strong scientific research base. The
structure and design of Reading Recovery are consistent with a large
body of substantial research on reading and writing behaviors that
began in the 1960s and continues today. Research on Reading Recovery
uses systematic, empirical methods to collect data annually on all
children receiving service. Reading Recovery is reported in numerous
peer-reviewed research articles or research reviews that offer
support for various aspects of Reading Recovery.
Accountability: Reading Recovery is highly accountable. Every
child’s progress is measured using standard, valid, and reliable
tests of letters, words, sounds, and reading books. The continued
progress of children after Reading Recovery has been externally
validated in many states, school districts, and schools around the
nation. In Maine, for example, a recent longitudinal study at the
University of Maine found that 84% of Reading Recovery children who
successfully completed their series of lessons met the state
standards in reading in fourth grade. These results for the lowest
achieving children who received 30 to 50 hours of one-to-one
instruction in the first grade are very impressive.
Cost Effectiveness: The immediate impact of Reading Recovery can be
felt in the school system in the form of reduced grade retentions
and referrals to special education or other long-term academic
support services. Of the 86,000 children who successfully completed
Reading Recovery in the United States in 2000-2001, only 137 were
placed in special education for reading or writing instruction at
the end of grade one. In addition, only 194 of these 86,000 children
were retained in first grade because of reading difficulties.
Resources: Two-thirds of schools with Reading Recovery report using
federal funds to assist with the cost of implementation. Reading
First funds are important, but they are not the only answer to every
child’s reading difficulties. All parts of the NCLB Act must receive
adequate funding for every eligible child to be served, and states
and local educational agencies must be able to choose programs like
Reading Recovery to meet their students’ learning needs.
In closing, I want to thank you for everything you have done and
will continue to do for children who need the most help learning to
read and write. More eloquent, however, are the thanks of parents
and children whose lives were changed by Reading Recovery. I will
close with their words, because they say it all:
Parent: I just wanted to say thank you. Jason has just finished 1st
grade and I am happy to say that he is reading on grade level. He
got on the school’s honor roll during the third nine weeks. Then he
went onto the principal’s high honor role during the third nine
weeks. He just got his end of year report and was reading on a level
18. He still reads every night and reminds me if we forget. His love
for reading is unbelievable. Reading Recovery builds more than just
the ability to read. It builds the child’s belief in themselves. I
have become a huge advocate in my community. I am doing everything I
can to spot light this program so that all parents are aware that it
is out there.
From a 15-year old former Reading Recovery Student: I still remember
how I felt in first grade when many of my friends were reading and I
just couldn’t figure it out. I began to feel embarrassed and
discouraged about school. I was then fortunate enough to be
identified for Reading Recovery help. . .Right away I began to feel
success and feel like a reader. . .I can’t imagine what school might
have been like without this invaluable support.
I would be happy to answer any questions.
|