NOINDEX
NOINDEX NOINDEX
NOINDEX
Home | Contact Us | Site Map

NOINDEX
NOINDEX
Research
Introduction to Research

National Data Evaluation Center

What Works Clearinghouse

Effectiveness

Continued Progress

Self-Esteem

Research Reviews

LTL Research Journal

Cost Effectiveness

Responding to Critics
includes/content/subnav.asp NOINDEX

WWC Flyer for Distribution

What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Documents Reading Recovery’s Scientific Research Base
 

The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC), a branch of the United States
Department of Education (USDE) and the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), released
a 3-year independent review of the experimental research on Reading Recovery in March 2007. This authoritative, independent assessment clearly establishes that Reading Recovery is an effective intervention based on scientific evidence.

The WWC found that Reading Recovery has positive effects—the WWC’s highest rating—on students’ alphabetics skills and general reading achievement. They found potentially positive effects, their next highest level of evidence, on fluency and comprehension outcomes.

The report includes an improvement index to reflect the strength of the Reading Recovery intervention. Scores on this index can range from -50 to +50. The improvement index scores for Reading Recovery students show large and impressive effect sizes.

No other beginning reading intervention has strong scientific evidence across all four domains, and no other intervention was judged to have positive effects on general reading achievement.

Related links

Schwartz, R. M., Askew, B. J., & Gómez-Bellengé, F. X. (2007). What works? Reading Recovery: An analysis of the What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report issued March 19, 2007. Worthington, OH: Reading Recovery Council of North America.

What This Means to Teachers and Schools

RRCNA Press Release on What Works Clearinghouse Report

Research on Reading Recovery’s Effectiveness

Other Research Reviews on Reading Recovery