Research Reviews
With more than 30 years of data, Reading Recovery is the world's most
widely studied early intervention. Scholars both inside and outside
Reading Recovery have summarized the studies to identify trends and
suggest future direction for research.
What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report: Reading Recovery.
(2007, March 19).
United States Department of Education, Institute of Education
Sciences.
A Synthesis of Research on Reading Recovery. T. Shanahan & R.
Barr. (1995). Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958-996.
How Much Evidence Is Enough Evidence? Richard Allington. (2005).
The Journal of Reading Recovery, 4 (2), 8-11.
Reading Recovery: A Review of Research. G.S. Pinnell. (1997). In
J. Squire, J. Flood, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of Research on
Teaching Literacy Through the Communication and Visual Arts (pp.
638-654). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA. (A project of
the International Reading Association).
Reading Recovery in the United States: What difference does it
make to an age cohort? E.H. Heibert. (1994). Educational Researcher,
23, 15-25.
Preventing Early Reading Failure With One-To-One Tutoring: A
Review of Five Programs. B.A. Wasik & R.E. Slavin. (1993).
Reading
Research Quarterly, 28, 179-200.
Ten Promising Programs for Educating All Children: Evidence of
Impact. R. Herman & S. Stringfield. (1997). Ten promising programs
for educating all children: Evidence of impact. Arlington, VA:
Educational Research Service.
Reading Recovery Review: Understandings Outcomes and
Implications. B.J. Askew, I.C. Fountas, C.A. Lyons, G.S. Pinnell, &
M.C. Schmitt. (1989). Columbus, OH: Reading Recovery Council of
North America.
Reading Recovery: An Analysis of a Research-Based Reading
Intervention. G.S. Pinnell. (2000). Columbus, OH: Reading
Recovery Council of North America.
|
